Matt Ford

The last thing this country needs is an FBI director who wants to show up for work and zealously enact Trump’s agenda.

The conservative legal movement’s latest broadside against the judiciary is likely to fail, but it illuminates how far they’re willing to go to dismantle the rule of law.

What began as Trump’s mass deportation scheme has spiraled into a campaign of intimidation against citizens lawfully using their rights.

His plan to send American citizens to foreign prisons is the latest in a long series of affronts to the American constitutional order.

The Supreme Court said in 2010 that the decision wouldn’t damage Americans’ faith in democracy. Whoops.

His administration deported more than 100 Venezuelan nationals on shaky, potentially unconstitutional grounds—and then violated a federal judge’s order to turn the flights around.

Legal skirmishes between the administration and lower court judges have highlighted the way the federal court system itself has become a thorn in the president’s side.

The conservative majority wants to apply a “history and tradition” test to the Second Amendment. But whose history—and what traditions—have yet to be decided.

Following a recent and troubling trend, the high court has taken up another case of fanciful claims that could do real harm to gay and trans Americans.

Two conservative justices joined the three liberals in ordering the administration to pay USAID contractors who are owed around $2 billion. But can that unlikely split hold?