A teenage boy who shot at his victim until the gun’s magazine was empty was instead found guilty of manslaughter after the judge concluded he had been provoked.
Under provincial law, records of complaints against Ontario judges are anonymous unless the judge has been ordered to face a public discipline hearing — a rare occurrence.
As the Star first reported Thursday, the man was reportedly able to get between the defence counsel and judge's tables at a fly-in court in Wapekeka, while court was in
Lawyers who were in the court reported that an individual walked in between the defence counsel and judge’s tables, “took something out and the officer at that point said ‘drop it, drop it’ and then was shot.”
Crown attorneys Meaghan Cunningham and Heather Donkers struggled to prove their case during the eight-week sexual assault trial of five former world juniors, which ended in acquittals delivered by Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia.
The woman known to the public only as E.M. alleged in graphic testimony earlier this year at the players' criminal trial that she was sexually assaulted by members of the
The Youth Criminal Justice Act “recognizes that there must be necessary exceptions to this information being available to, and used by, third parties,” the judge found.
The London police detective’s conclusion that the complainant could have been an “active participant” reflects an “incorrect understanding of what consent actually means in law,” the prosecutors said in written