David Gorski

An eminent cancer researche is promoting a study that seems to show—but, when critically examined, doesn't—that COVID vaccines are associated with increased cancer risk.

[Editor note: Regular readers might—or might not have—noticed last Monday that, for the first time in more years than I can remember, I failed to post anything and didn't even repost something fr

Nature Reviews Cancer published a commentary promoting "integrative oncology"—or what I like to call "integrating" quackery with oncology. The battle continues.

The Washington Post recently published an article asking if COVID-19 infection can cause cancer. Probably not, but it's more plausible than the vaccine.

Exploring issues and controversies in the relationship between science and medicine

At SBM, we’ve long argued that chelation therapy for heart disease is quackery. An abstract presented recently finally confirmed that. Why did it take so long?

COVID-19 antivax quacks are now “repurposing” ivermectin for cancer

Antivax scientist Byram Bridle just took the “new school” antivax movement old school by implying that COVID-19 vaccines might cause an “epidemic of autism.”

Exploring issues and controversies in the relationship between science and medicine

Mark Skidmore’s antivax paper claiming that COVID-19 vaccines might have killed 278K people was republished in a fake journal, thus “laundering” his study.