Karen Weaver

Schools want to protect their future rights by "sublicensing" the NIL revenues athletes derive from sponsorship deals and increased media rights.

An overwhelming majority of college athletes want to become a part of the attention economy, defined as those trying to break through the deluge of social media content.

The issue of collective bargaining at public land grant universities appears to be a major sticking point in addressing the legal problems facing college athletics.

A day after UNLV quarterback Matthew Sluka announced he is no longer playing for the Rebels after “misrepresentations” over NIL payments, the attorneys in the House v NCAA legal action released their revised settlement proposal.

With the House v NCAA settlement we’ll soon learn what both sides want and, more importantly, what they’ve agreed to give up.

AI has entered the chat for NCAA video creating new revenue opportunities for college athletes.

The reckoning that college athletics is facing may end up rightsizing the athletics program at many schools. Campus budgetary pressures are real, and athletics spending will not slow down.

The hits just keep on coming for college athletics. With much of the NCAA membership reeling from the proposed $2.75 billion House settlement, two trends are emerging impacting the workforce that keeps their departments running.

The financial realities of this settlement poses a real threat to many Olympic sports’ survival, while the broader NCAA landscape faces a decade of recalibration.

A string of small private institutions who weathered the Covid-19 pandemic are facing the stark reality that they are no longer solvent.