Dick Morris

Kamla Harris can't be allowed to smuggle in the most radical tax plans while she spends her time debating social issues.

The majority of voters agree with Trump on issues and applaud his accomplishments even as a sizable minority don’t like his personality. But that’s a tradeoff Trump can make and still win. By hammering on mistakes Trump makes, Harris has identified a path to irrelevance.

To end a politics predicated on fission and to embrace one based on fusion requires not a warm and fuzzy leader to assuage ruffled feelings, but a determined, financially independent bulldog to confront the establishment. Donald Trump can do so.

Once the blue wall crumbles, Trump’s vote totals will likely soar. This may not be a close race after all. Look for the former president to carry all the swing, and to win or close the gap in Virginia and Minnesota, and a host of unlikely states.

Landslides take time to build and they are by no means evident weeks before an election. And so it is with Trump v. Harris.

Trump rightly justifies the tariffs by noting that the rest of the world has been taking advantage of our generosity in racking up a $773 billion trade surplus with us last year and that it's now time to even the score.

This fall, Trump has found that triangulation on abortion is working where combat has failed. Politicians are good at handing "No," but when their political opponents start saying "Yes," they're dumbfounded.

Harris’ campaign, with its efforts to break thru with white women, using the abortion issue, is making no progress among whites.

In the last week of the campaign, Harris is pushing public funding for gender change for incarcerated felons while Trump is seeking tax relief for adult children of elderly parents. Which endgame is the more viable for our nation?

Expressing an openness to deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, Adams is further distancing himself from more progressive members of his party. Don’t count Adams out in 2025.